Legal Opinion · Dissent

Frank D. Felix D/B/A Club Zeus v. Coleman A. Young, Mayor, City of Detroit

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 17, 1976No. 75-1763Published

1DissentMcCREE, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s decision holding the challenged ordinance to be facially constitutional under the Twenty-first Amendment.

In California v. LaRue, 409 U.S. 109, 93 S.Ct. 390, 34 L.Ed.2d 342 (1972), the Supreme Court considered regulations issued by the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control that prohibited performances by male or female entertainers that partook “more of gross sexuality than of communication.” 409 U.S. at 109, 93 S.Ct. at 391. The portions of the regulations held facially constitutional by the Supreme Court prohibited the following kinds…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. California v. LaRueSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Tally v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Tally v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API