Legal Opinion
Offenhartz v. Heinsohn
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 23, 1956PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSamuel W. Eager, J.
By this action, plaintiffs seek (by their first alleged cause of action) to establish and enjoin interference with an easement to maintain and use a pipe line running under*694ground through the lands of the defendant Heinsohn for purpose of transmission of water from certain springs to a reservoir located upon plaintiffs’ premises; or, in the alternative (by their second alleged cause of action), to recover damages of the defendant Inter-County Title Guaranty & Mortgage Company for alleged breach of covenants of a title policy alleged to insure the plaintiffs against damages by reason of a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lewis v. . New York Harlem R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Pirman v. ConferNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Butterworth v. . CrawfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Hammond v. . ZehnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Moore v. DayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Heyd v. Chicago Title InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
- Merriam v. 352 West 42nd Street Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
- Powell v. DawsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Van Arsdale v. Metropolitan Title Guaranty Co.Nassau County District Court · 1980
- Sullivan v. NeamDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.