Legal Opinion
Goldberg v. Southern Builders, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided July 10, 1950No. 10486_1PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WASHINGTON, Circuit Judge.
The question here presented is whether Magnolia Gardens, Inc., a foreign corporation, which conducts certain activities in the District of Columbia, is doing or transacting business in this District within the meaning of Section 13 — 103 of the District of Columbia Code, so that it may be served with process and made amenable to the jurisdiction of our courts.
Plaintiff Goldberg, appellant here, brought suit in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia against South- era Builders, Inc., a foreign corporation. A writ of attachment and garnishment…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Harris v. BalkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Hutchinson v. Chase & Gilbert, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- Frene v. Louisville Cement Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
- Melvin Pine & Co. v. McConnellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hassan El-Fadl v. Central Bank of JordanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Blodgett v. University ClubDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- AMAF International Corp. v. Ralston Purina Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Ramamurti v. Rolls-Royce Ltd.District Court, District of Columbia · 1978
- Fiat Motor Company, Inc. v. Alabama Imported Cars, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.