Legal Opinion

Goodwin v. Omaha Printing Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1936No. 29817PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

This suit was instituted by Mabel Goodwin to recover compensation for the death of her husband, Russell Goodwin, under the workmen’s compensation law of this state. From a judgment awarding the compensation, the 'defendants have appealed.

The record discloses that Russell Goodwin, at and prior to his death, had been employed by the Omaha Printing Company of Omaha, Nebraska, as a salesman. It was his duty to call on and sell to various county officers in the state of Nebraska. He had been in the employ of the Omaha Printing Company for 15 years and, at the time of his death, was receiving wages…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Industrial Commission v. Pueblo Auto Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1922
  2. City of Fremont v. LeaNebraska Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Industrial Commission v. HunterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  4. Coster v. Thompson Hotel Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Good v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. White v. Atlantic City PressSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  2. P.A.M. v. Quad L. AssociatesNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Renshaw v. Merrigol-Adler BakeryNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Hopper v. KoenigsteinNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Peterson v. Brinn & Jensen Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1938

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API