Legal Opinion

Industrial Commission v. Hunter

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 2, 1923No. 10,574PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Teller

The defendants in error were claimants under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, as dependents upon William Hunter, deceased, who was at the time of his death, a water commissioner residing at Rye, Colorado. He was killed while riding in an automobile from his home to Pueblo in company with one Parks. The circumstances of the killing are recited in Industrial Commission v. Pueblo Co., 71 Colo. 424, 207 Pac. 479. The commission found that the killing did not arise out of his employment, though he was at the time acting in the course of his employment. The district court of Pueblo county held that,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Claim of Katz v. A. Kadans & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. Industrial Commission v. Aetna Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1918
  3. Industrial Commission v. Pueblo Auto Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1922
  4. Claim of Rosmuth v. American Radiator Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Wahlig v. Krenning-Schlapp Grocer Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  2. Aetna Life Insurance v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  3. Beem v. H. D. Lee Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  4. Comstock v. BivensSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  5. London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. McCoySupreme Court of Colorado · 1935

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API