Lemmon v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JACOBSON, Presiding Judge.
This special action review arises from the Industrial Commission’s decision regarding claimant Lemmon’s assertion that he suffered industrial injuries arising out of his employment with respondent KAMSCO.
For approximately five months prior to the incident in question, claimant worked for KAMSCO as an electrician's helper. During this period, claimant and other KAMSCO employees performed construction work at a condominium complex. Portions of the complex had been completed, sold and occupied by residents. KAMSCO expressly prohibited its employees from entering…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McCarty v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Truck Insurance Exchange v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
- Anderson Clayton & Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
- Atkison v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
- Herman v. Greenpoint Barrel & Drum Reconditioning Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Walls v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF UTAHCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993
- Jayo v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
- Walls v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF UTAHCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993