Jackson v. Crimer
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, P. J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.)
1. The petition was not subject to general demurrer. The defendant contends that while the plaintiff alleged that at the time he was struck by the automobile he was crossing Marietta Street at a place where employees of Eandall Brothers and the public in general frequently cross, it affirmatively appeared from the petition that this place was not a public street crossing, because the petition showed that the regular street crossing at the intersection of Marietta Street and North Avenue was “about 100 feet” therefrom, and therefore that the petition…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- O'Dowd v. NewnhamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
- Eubanks v. MullisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- Massell Realty Co. v. HanburySupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
- Collins v. Augusta-Aiken Railway & Electric Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
- Western & Atlantic Railroad v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Garmon v. CassellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
- Griffin v. OdumCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- Shelton v. RoseCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- He-Po Gas Incorporated v. RoathCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
- Díaz Cruz v. Stuckert Motor Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.