AURITT v. AURITT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE GARY AURITT, ) ) Plaintiff ) ) v. ) No. 2:18-cv-00471-DBH ) SHANNON AURITT, ) ) Defendant ) AMENDED RECOMMENDED DECISION ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT1 In this case arising from disputes over intellectual property rights in the plumbing fixture industry, pro se defendant Shannon Auritt moves for summary judgment as to all four claims against her by her ex-husband Gary Auritt, see Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (“Defendant’s Motion”) (ECF No. 106) at 2, 8, 20-21; Amended Complaint (ECF No. 59) ¶¶ 53- 68, and the parties cross-move for…