Legal Opinion

Enos v. Honolulu Motor Coach Co.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided August 13, 1936No. 2260PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

PETERS, J.

Appellants, plaintiffs below, brought an action for damages under the provisions of section 4052, R. L. 1935. They are the parents and minor sisters of the deceased. The defendant was not the employer of the decedent at the time of the latter’s death.

The statute gives a right of action to dependents for the death by a wrongful act of one upon whom they were ■wholly or partly dependent and permits the recovery of such damages as “under all the circumstances may be just.”

The complaint in addition to alleging damages arising-from the deprivation of continued…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kake v. HortonHawaii Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Hisakichi Wada v. Associated Oil Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re Air Crash Disaster Near Chicago, Illinois on May 25, 1979Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
  2. Ginoza Ex Rel. Ginoza v. TakaiHawaii Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Rohlfing v. Moses Akiona, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Scruggs v. MeredithDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1955
  5. Gabriel v. MargahHawaii Supreme Court · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API