Legal Opinion
Eitan v. Aterian, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 18, 2023No. 1:22-cv-07905Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOSEF EITAN and RAN NIR, Petitioners, Case No. 1:22-cv-07905 (JLR) -against- OPINION AND ORDER ATERIAN, INC. and TRUWEO, LLC, Respondents. JENNIFER L. ROCHON, United States District Judge: Petitioners Josef Eitan (“Eitan”) and Ran Nir (“Nir,” and together with Eitan, “Petitioners”) move pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”), 9 U.S.C. § 4, to compel Respondents Aterian, Inc. and Truweo, LLC (“Respondents”) to arbitrate specific issues related to the Earn-Out Payment under the Stock Purchase Agreement (“SPA” or “Agreement”)…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Nicosia v. Amazon.com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.