Williams v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Grice, Justice.
Whether an indictment charging possession of indecent and obscene photographs is subject to the defendant’s demurrers is the issue presented to this court. Jurisdiction is invoked since some of the demurrers challenge the constitutionality of the statute upon which the indictment is founded.
That statute is Ga. L. 1878-9, p. 163, as amended (Code Ann. § 26-6301), which, insofar as is relevant here, provides: '“Any person . . . who shall possess . . . any indecent, immoral, or obscene pictorial newspaper, book, pamphlet, magazine, newspaper, film, picture, recording or other…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Richmond Concrete Products Co. v. WardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
- Sanders v. HintonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
- Jordan v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
- Buchanan v. HeathSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
- Adams v. RaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
3Cited by14 opinions
- Swint v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964
- McCulley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
- Parker v. LeeuwenburgSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
- State v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Culwell v. Lomas & Nettleton Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.