Legal Opinion

Parker v. Leeuwenburg

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 6, 2017No. S16A1505PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNSTEIN, Justice.

This case presents a facial challenge to OCGA § 17-6-90, Georgia’s good behavior bond statute, which permits “[a] ny judicial officer authorized to hold a court of inquiry” to conduct a hearing and, where sufficient cause is shown, require a party to secure a good behavior bond “to ensure the safety of persons or property in the county or the preservation of the peace of the county.” OCGA § 17-6-90 (a). As addressed below, however, we do not reach the constitutional question posed in this case because the complaining party lacks standing to pursue such a challenge.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Adam Elend v. Sun Dome, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
  3. Baker v. City of MariettaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  4. Blackmon v. Tenet Healthsystem Spalding, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2008
  5. Perdue v. LakeSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Brooks v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
  2. NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUESupreme Court of Georgia · 2018
  3. New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. Ga. Dep't of RevenueSupreme Court of Georgia · 2018
  4. BLACK VOTERS MATTER FUND, INC. v. KEMP, GOVERNOR (Five Cases)Supreme Court of Georgia · 2022
  5. Maxim Cabaret, Inc. v. City of Sandy SpringsSupreme Court of Georgia · 2018

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API