Legal Opinion

Mansfield v. Hammond

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 10, 1935PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Heher, J.

We are in accord with the conclusion of the learned vice-chancellor that the bill of complaint should be dismissed.

We are not to be understood as giving assent to the view, expressed in the opinion, that the sale of the lands in question was a valid exercise of a power of sale given contemporaneously with the deed of conveyance to respondent Hammond within the rule laid down in Clark v. Condit, 18 N. J. Eq. 358.

Notwithstanding the contrary implication of the ruling so made by the vice-chancellor, this conveyance was indisputably an equitable…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Guaranty Trust and Safe Deposit Co. v. Green Cove Springs and Melrose RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Chicago & Vincennes Railroad v. FosdickSupreme Court of the United States · 1882

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. DoerrNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
  2. Orange Land Company v. BenderNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  3. Mercury Capital Corp. v. Freehold Office Park, Ltd.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
  4. Scottsdale Associates, Inc. v. Seatrain Lines, Inc. (In Re Seatrain Lines, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1982
  5. Giantsea New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. v. LiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API