Legal Opinion

United States v. Kyocera International, Inc.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 24, 1982No. 82-6PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BALDWIN, Judge.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the United States Court of International *797Trade, _ CIT _, 527 F.Supp. 337 (1981) sustaining appellee’s claim that the imported “multilayer electronic parts” were improperly classified as “other electrical apparatus * * * for the protection of electrical circuits, or for making connections to or in electrical circuits” under item 685.90, Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS), and were correctly classifiable as “other related electronic crystal components” under item 687.60, TSUS. We affirm.

OPINION

We agree with the more realistic…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nippon Kogaku (USA), Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
  2. Kyocera International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1981

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Marcor Development Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
  2. Marcel Watch Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992
  3. Nissho Iwai American Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
  4. Rollix Bearing, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1991
  5. Kyocera Industrial Ceramics Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API