Legal Opinion

Devore v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 11, 1994No. 1773 C.D. 1993PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRAIG, President Judge.

The petitioner, Alfred DeVore, asks that we reverse the decision of the Worker’s Compensation Appeal Board that affirms the decision of a referee to grant the petition of employer, Sun Oil Company, for modification and to deny DeVore’s petition for penalties. The question before us is whether Sun Oil waived its right to subrogation, pursuant to § 319 of the Workers’ Compensation Act, Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, as amended, 77 P.S. § 671 (the Act), as to DeVore’s third-party settlements of asbestosis-related product liability claims by seeking subrogation only after…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Winfree v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. McGoldrick v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Commonwealth v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Ward v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Shuster v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Brutico v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Orenich v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Sears v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. P. & R. Welding & Fabricating v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API