Legal Opinion

City of Charlotte v. Ertel

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 17, 2005No. COA04-1110PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TIMMONS-GOODSON, Judge.

Thomas Ertel (“Mr. Ertel”) and Candice Ertel (“Ms. Ertel”) (collectively, “appellants”) were awarded $680,000.00 plus interest for the taking by eminent domain of their 7.18 acre tract of property and improvements in Mecklenburg County. Following the jury’s verdict, appellants filed a motion for a new trial. On 19 May 2004, the trial court entered judgment and denied appellants’ motion. For the reasons discussed herein, we affirm the judgment and order of the trial court.

The facts and procedural history pertinent to the instant appeal are as follows: In 2002, appellants…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Worthington v. BynumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Barnes v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  3. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. Hanna v. BradyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. North Carolina State Highway Commission v. CogginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bluebird Corp. v. AubinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  2. Nguyen v. Burgerbusters, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  3. Jackson v. CarlandCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  4. Chambliss v. Health Sciences Foundation, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API