Legal Opinion

Chambliss v. Health Sciences Foundation, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 7, 2006No. COA04-1687Published

1Opinion of the Court

CALABRIA, Judge.

Health Sciences Foundation, Inc. (“Foundation”), Coastal Area Health Education Center (“Coastal”), Women’s Health Specialties-North (“Specialties”), and Julie Ramsey (“Ramsey”) (collectively known as “appellants”) appeal the 24 August 2004 judgment in favor of Kelly Chambliss (“Kelly”) and Caroline Chambliss (“Caroline”) (collectively known as “appellees”) for injuries resulting from an unwashed sperm specimen in an insemination procedure). We affirm in part and find no error in part.

Appellees Kelly and Caroline Chambliss, both female, are life partners. Appellees desired to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Worthington v. BynumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Okwara v. Dillard Department Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  3. Williamson v. LiptzinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  4. Burgess v. VestalCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  5. Pittman v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API