Legal Opinion

Davignon v. Clemmey

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided November 21, 2001No. 99-11875-WGYPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON POST-TRIAL MOTIONS

YOUNG, Chief Judge.

A jury found the individual defendants liable for assault and battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and violation of the Massachusetts Civil Rights Act, Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 12, § 111. The jury’s award totaled $4,850,000.00. This memorandum addresses the defendants’ post-trial motion to set aside or reduce the verdict, and the plaintiffs’ petition for attorneys’ fees and costs.

I. INTRODUCTION

The individual defendants are Karl Clemmey and his son, “Dan” Clemmey (together, the “Clemmeys”). Karl Clem-mey owns real…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Grendel's Den, Inc. v. John P. Larkin, Cambridge License Commission, Grendel's Den, Inc. v. John P. LarkinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
  4. Annabelle Lipsett v. Gumersindo BlancoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  5. Ferriter v. Daniel O'Connell's Sons, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mogilevsky v. Bally Total Fitness Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
  2. Martino v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002
  3. Minarik Elec. Co. v. Electro Sales Co., Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002
  4. Smith v. City of BostonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API