Legal Opinion

Cavazos v. Simmons

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided August 15, 1988No. Civ. A. Nos. CA3-88-0256-D to CA3-88-0259-D, Bankruptcy Nos. 386-34423-RCM-7, 386-33778-RCM-7, 383-00407-RCM-7 and 387-31614-RCM-7PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FITZWATER, District Judge.

These consolidated appeals present the question whether the limit on reasonable compensation for a trustee’s services prescribed by 11 U.S.C. § 326(a) applies to a paraprofessional employed by the trustee. Because the court concludes that § 326(a) governs only the trustee’s services and not those of a paraprofessional, the court vacates the appealed orders and remands these cases for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion.

I

Plaintiffs-appellants, Arnaldo N. Cava-zos, Jr. and Charles B. Hendricks, 1 are two chapter 7 trustees appointed by the United States…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Rubin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Burlington Northern Railroad v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. United States v. JamesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Cimmaron Oil Co., Inc. v. Cameron Consultants, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. In Re Orthopaedic Technology, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1989
  2. In Re Churchfield Management & Investment Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
  3. Stewart v. Law Offices of Dennis OlsonDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1988
  4. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. LoydDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1990
  5. In Re AbrahamUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 1994

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API