In re the Armory Board
New York Supreme Court
Proceedings instituted under the Condemnation Law. Code-of Civil Procedure, § 3357, et seq.
1Opinion of the CourtBeekman, J.
In this proceeding, which was instituted under-the Condemnation Law (Code Civ. Pro., § 3357, et seq.), commissioners were duly appointed, and, having made their report, this-motion has come on to be heard for the confirmation of the same. While no question is raised with respect to the fairness and sufficiency of the amount at which the commissioners have appraised the property as a whole, a dispute has arisen between the owners andi their lessee concerning the justice of the valuation of their respective interests in the property and the apportionment which has-been made of the appraised…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Greason v. . KeteltasNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Losey v. . StanleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Stevenson v. . LesleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Gomez v. . GomezNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Newcomb v. KetteltasNew York Supreme Court · 1855
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hubbell v. HubbellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- C. C. Slaughter Cattle Co. v. Potter CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Loud v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1926
- Equitable Trust Co. v. Delaware Trust Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1947
- Adler v. AdlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.