Legal Opinion

Moore v. Bank of the Metropolis

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 27, 1839PublishedCited by 22 opinions

IN error to the Circuit Court of the United States, for- the county of Washington, in the District of Columbia. The Bank of the Metropolis, oh the 27th of September, 1837, instituted an action of assumpsit against, Thomas P. Moore, the plaintiff in error, on a promissory note dated the 16th day of February, 1837, payable sixty days after date; by which the defendant, Thomas P. Moore, P. H. Pope, and Richard M. Johnson, by George Thomas, their attorney at Washington, jointly…

Read the full summary

IN error to the Circuit Court of the United States, for- the county of Washington, in the District of Columbia. The Bank of the Metropolis, oh the 27th of September, 1837, instituted an action of assumpsit against, Thomas P. Moore, the plaintiff in error, on a promissory note dated the 16th day of February, 1837, payable sixty days after date; by which the defendant, Thomas P. Moore, P. H. Pope, and Richard M. Johnson, by George Thomas, their attorney at Washington, jointly and severally promised to pay to the plaintiffs the sum of five thousand dollars current money of the United States, for…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thompson

This case comes up on á writ of error to the Circuit Court of the United States, for the District of Columbia, in the county of Washington.

■ It is an action of assumpsit, upon a promissory note, purporting -to'have been made by the defendant, and Richard M. Johnson, and P. H. Pope, by their attorney, George Thomas; the note, bearing date the 16th of February, 1837; by which the makers, jointly and severally, promise to pay to the President and Directors of the Bank of the- Metropolis or order, sixty days after date, the sum of five thousand dollars.

The-declaration also contains the common…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Barry v. FoylesSupreme Court of the United States · 1828

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Rush v. FrenchArizona Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Lipscomb v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Chicago Great Western Ry. Co. v. McDonoughCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
  4. Budd v. BrookeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1845
  5. Northern Pac. R. Co. v. CharlessCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1892

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API