Legal Opinion

Drum v. Seawell

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 4, 1966No. 1128PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

383 U.S. 831 (1966)

DRUM ET AL.

v.

SEAWELL, CHAIRMAN OF THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, ET AL.

No. 1128.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided April 4, 1966.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA.

Louis Rabil and Robinson O. Everett for appellants.

T. Wade Bruton, Attorney General of North Carolina, James F. Bullock, Assistant Attorney General, and Thomas L. Young for appellees.

2Per curiam

The motion to advance and expedite consideration is granted. The judgment is affirmed.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Kilgarlin v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Stephenson v. BartlettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  3. Connor v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Baker v. BindnerDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1967
  5. In re the Ordinance of Annexation No. 1977-4Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API