Rettler v. Ebreck
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BURKE, Chief Justice.
These .actions were instituted for the purpose of recovering, for damages suffered by the plaintiffs in a .collision between an automobile, owned and operated by the defendant, and a caterpillar tractor. At the time of the collision plaintiffs were passengers in defendant’s car and their complaints alleged that their injuries were proximately caused by the gross negligence of the defendant. In his. answers the defendant denied -any négligeiicíe'■ on .'his part and'alleged contributory-negligence on the part of the plaintiffs. The -actions were consolidated for purposes of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McCullagh v. FortuneNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1949
- Olson v. Kem Temple Ancient Arabic Order of the Mystic ShrineNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
- Rubbelke v. JacobsenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
- Erickson v. FoleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935
- South Penn Oil Co. v. KnoxWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1910
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Roy Steinberg v. Sahara Sam's Oasis, Llc(075294)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2016
- Grenz v. WerreNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
- King v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
- Mondy v. GjesdalNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
- Sheets v. PendergrastNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.