Legal Opinion

Menzie v. Kelly

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 7, 1881PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the City Court of East St. Louis; the Hon. Chas. P. Ware, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtBakes, J.

This was replevin brought by Menzie, appellant, against Kelly, appellee. The case was submitted to the court, upon an agreed statement of facts. The court found for appellee, and rendered judgment against appellant for costs, and awarded a writ of retorno habendo. In the case of Mineral Point R. R. Co. v. Barron, 83 Ill. 365, the Supreme Court held that the statute of this State exempting $25 of wages due a party who is the head of a family, and resides with the same, from garnishment, is not confined to residents of this State, but applies also to wages due a non-resident. This was so…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mineral Point Railroad v. BarronIllinois Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bond v. TurnerOregon Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Griffin v. MaxwellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1887
  3. Lansden v. HamptonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API