Legal Opinion

Bond v. Turner

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 13, 1898PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From Umatilla; Stephen A. Lowell, Judge. Replevin by Ellen Gf. Bond against D. Turner and Rudolph Martin for certain household furniture. Plaintiff had a judgment, from which defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bean

This is an action commenced in the Circuit Court of Umatilla County, to recover the possession of some household furniture seized by the defendant, Turner, on the *552twenty-sixth day of May, 1897, to satisfy an execution issued on a judgment recovered by the defendant, Martin, against the plaintiff in the Justice’s Court for North Pendleton Precinct. The facts are that for some time prior to the seventeenth day of May, 1897, the plaintiff had been a resident and householder within the City of Pendleton, engaged in keeping a boarding house; but, about the time mentioned, she closed her business,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wright v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Mineral Point Railroad v. BarronIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. MaltbySupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  4. Wabash Railroad v. DouganIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Haskill v. AndrosSupreme Court of Vermont · 1832

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Lankford v. CollinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. In Re StrattonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 2001
  3. McGirl v. BrewerOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Stark v. StarkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API