Kazaka v. State
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtWashburn, J.
There was one other item of evidence which was clearly incompetent, but to which no objection wa's made — to the effect that the search was made because the officers had received complaints of liquor being sold on the Kazaka premises; the right to search the premises was in no way involved in the case, and such eviednce was rank hearsay and so indefinite and general as to be valueless, and we cannot conceive of the same being considered by the trial judge, even though no objection was made to it.
Even if the .intoxicating liquor had been found upon Kazaka’s premises, the evidence in this case…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hedrick v. LeeIdaho Supreme Court · 1924
- State v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1924
- Glowaski v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 1925