Legal Opinion

Glowaski v. State

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 10, 1925PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWashbuen, J.

By the laws of Ohio it is made an offense to possess intoxicating liqnor except in certain places and under certain circumstances. It is settled that upon the trial of one charged with possession, proof that he had possession of the liquor is sufficient, unless he offers proof showing that circumstances were such as permitted him to have possession thereof under the law.

In the Joe George case the defendant was convicted of illegal transportation of intoxicating liquor; in the Harris case and in the Glowaski case the defendants were found guilty of illegal possession of liquor. In all of these…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. HarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  2. State v. CoxOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  3. State v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1924
  4. State v. BuoyOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  5. West v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. EberhardtNebraska Supreme Court · 1963
  2. State v. KominisOhio Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. State v. HarmonOhio Court of Appeals · 1958
  4. Kazaka v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 1929
  5. State v. EberhardtNebraska Supreme Court · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API