Legal Opinion

Schmid, Recr. v. Nat'l. Bank

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1938No. 7154PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Critz

This suit was filed in the District Court of Wichita County, Texas, by W. A. Schmid, as receiver for the Zenith Oil Producing Company, against City National Bank of Wichita Falls, Texas, and City National Company of Wichita Falls, Texas, both corporations, to recover for usurious interest, alleged to have been paid on a loan negotiated and consummated as will be hereinafter shown. Trial in the district court, where the case was submitted to a jury on special issues, resulted in a verdict and judgment for the defendants. On appeal, this judgment was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals at…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nevels v. HarrisTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Adleson v. B. F. Dittmar Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Texarkana & Fort Smith Railway Co. v. Houston Gas & Fuel Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Roberts v. CoffinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1899

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Stedman v. Georgetown Savings & Loan Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,484 John F. Maher v. Zapata Corporation v. William Maldonado, Objector-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  3. Gonzales County Savings & Loan Ass'n v. FreemanTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Whatley v. National Bank of CommerceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  5. Miller v. First State BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API