In re Cohen
New York Supreme Court
Motion ■ to vacate an order to take the depositions of expected adverse parties where no action is pending.
1Opinion of the CourtGreenbaum, J.
The affidavit upon which the order in this case was obtained seems to me to be fatally defective in several particulars. Matter of Ellett v. Young, 95 App. Div. 417, sufficiently indicates the difference recognized in the provisions of the Code between a case where an action is pending and one where no action is pending. In the latter case a compliance with the provisions of subdivision 6, section 871 of the Code of Civil Procedure is a prerequisite. The affidavit of the applicants omits to state the street and street number of the office or place of business of the expected adverse parties,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Goldmark v. U. S. Electro-Galvanizing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
- Ellett v. YoungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
- Hill v. McKaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906