Legal Opinion

Bacon v. Kent-Ottawa Metropolitan Water Authority

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1958No. Docket 57, Calendar 47,806PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

This bill, in essence one for declaratory relief, was filed in the Kent circuit. The plaintiff, Carter Bacon, is a taxpayer of the city of East Grand Rapids. The city of East Grand Rapids, by petition for and duly authorized intervention, supports plaintiff’s bill and prays for the same relief; that of enjoining defendant permanently from pursuit of resolved proceeedings which, if - valid, are -made so by PA 1957, No 4 (CL 1948, § 121.1 et seq. [Stat Ann *1621958 Rev § 5.2533(31) et seq.]).* The bill, following due hearing below, was dismissed. Plaintiff, and the named intervenor, appeal from…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Bay City v. State TreasurerMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  2. School District v. City of PontiacMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Kearney v. Board of State AuditorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Thompson v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  5. People ex. rel. Hughes v. MayMichigan Supreme Court · 1855

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Williams v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Alan v. Wayne CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  4. McDowell v. State Highway CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Lockwood v. Commissioner of RevenueMichigan Supreme Court · 1959

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API