Legal Opinion

Gemignani v. Pete

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 15, 2003No. 99-CV-0233-AB, 99-CV-0241-MS A114364 (Control), A114576Published

1Opinion of the Court

71 P.3d 87 (2003)

187 Or. App. 584

Asa GEMIGNANI and Gregory Gemignani, Respondents,

v.

Tenos M. PETE, Appellant.

Benjamin A. Golding and Frances T. Golding, as Trustees of the Golding Trust, Respondents,

v.

Tenos M. Pete, Appellant.

99-CV-0233-AB, 99-CV-0241-MS; A114364 (Control), A114576.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted September 4, 2002.

Decided May 15, 2003.

Martin M. Fisher, Eugene, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Lawrence M. Gorman, Bend, and Lage Fisher Emerson, LLP.

Steven D. Bryant, Redmond, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brown v. J. C. Penney Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Woodbury v. CH2M Hill, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Denson v. Ron Tonkin Gran Turismo, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Salem Tent & Awning Co. v. SchmidtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  5. Stirling-Wanner v. Pocket Novels, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API