Balthazor v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COATS, Judge.
Michael Balthazor appeals his conviction for sale of cocaine in violation of AS 17.10.-010.1 Balthazor argues that his conviction should be reversed because it was obtained by the use of statements which Balthazor made to Kodiak Police Captain Glen Herbst. Balthazor claims that these statements were made in violation of his constitutional rights because he was not warned of his Miranda2 rights before he talked to Captain Herbst and because the statements were taken in violation of his right to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.3
Balthazor was arraigned on…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Billy Gene ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
- Hawley v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
- Loveless v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Depp v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1984
- McLaughlin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1987