Toscano-Gil v. Trominski
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RHESA HAWKINS BARKSDALE, Circuit Judge:
The linchpin to the Government’s challenge to the 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas relief granted excludable alien Isaías Toscano-Gil is whether he states a cognizable constitutional claim by asserting that, in denying him a waiver of inadmissibility, the Board of Immigration Appeals violated his right to procedural due process by characterizing his DWI arrest as a conviction and failing to discuss certain relevant factors or distinguish BIA precedent. Because such contentions do not state a cognizable constitutional claim, we REVERSE and DISMISS.
I
Mexican native…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Reno v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States Ex Rel. Vajtauer v. Commissioner of ImmigrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- BURBANOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1994
- MARINBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1978
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Yueh-Shaio YangSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Lara v. TrominskiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Hernandez v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Maria Del Consuelo Cevilla v. Alberto R. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Nguyen v. District Director, Bureau of Immigration & Customs EnforcementCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- Bouchikhi v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.