Legal Opinion
People v. Scott
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 27, 1994PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court properly denied the motion to suppress the in-court identification of defendant. Defendant contends that the People’s CPL 710.30 notice of a pretrial identification of him from a photographic array was insufficient because it stated only that "[t]he People intend to offer testimony identifying defendant as a person who committed the offense charged, to be given by a witness who previously identified defendant as such”. The record reveals that, when defendant received the CPL 710.30 notice, he also received the People’s file, which…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. RandolphNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- People v. AmparoNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. FrattaNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- People v. SimmonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- People v. PalermoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. BorthwickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. LinderberryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Allah v. KellyDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1998
- People v. CruickshankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000