Huff v. Lutz
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Hamilton Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Bicknell, C. C.
The appellee in his complaint alleged that he and George Sperry were partners in a flouring-mill; that he, as surviving partner, under the order of the Delaware Circuit Court, converted the assets of the partnership into money; that the debts of the firm exceeded the amount realized from the assets by $1,394.46; that he has paid all of said debts except $1,404.62, and has only $10.16 left of the proceeds of said assets; that of said $1,394.46 each partner ought to pay one-half; that he has assumed to pay and has secured all of said $1,404.62, and that the creditors of the firm…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bake v. SmileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Weyer v. ThornburghIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
- Hardy v. MitchellIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
- Bond v. NaveIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- Olleman v. Reagan's AdministratorIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
3Cited by4 opinions
- State ex rel. Talbott v. EmmonsIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- American Bonding Co. v. State ex rel. WhislerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1907
- Beste v. BurgerNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1885
- Beckett v. LittleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899