Legal Opinion

Irvin v. Laxmi, Inc.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 5, 1996No. S95A1665, S95X1666PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fletcher, Presiding Justice.

In this appeal, adjoining property owners dispute the scope of express easements to a private alley and a parking lot. The trial court ruled that Laxmi, Inc., as holder of the easement, may bury a propane tank in the alley and erect curbing in the parking lot. Because the easements do not grant the unrestricted right to construct curbing and the trial court did not determine the alley’s location, we reverse and remand.

In 1967, Irvin’s predecessor-in-title conveyed by warranty deed a 0.18-acre lot and easement to Laxmi’s predecessor-in-title to permit a motel…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hardman v. Dahlonega-Lumpkin County Chamber of CommerceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Municipal Electric Authority v. Gold-Arrow Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  2. Knott v. KnottSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
  3. Atlanta Development, Inc. v. Emerald Capital Investment, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  4. De Castro v. DurrellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  5. Rushing v. Gold Kist, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2002

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API