Meader v. Trout Brook Ice & Feed Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Action to recover money paid by the plaintiff to the defendant because of its alleged false representations, brought to and tried by the Court of Common Pleas in Hartford County, Dickenson, J.; facts found and judgment rendered for the plaintiff for $607, and appeal by the defendant. The plaintiff also appealed from the refusal of the trial judge to amend or correct the finding. No error.
Read the full summary
Action to recover money paid by the plaintiff to the defendant because of its alleged false representations, brought to and tried by the Court of Common Pleas in Hartford County, Dickenson, J.; facts found and judgment rendered for the plaintiff for $607, and appeal by the defendant. The plaintiff also appealed from the refusal of the trial judge to amend or correct the finding. No error. The trial court found the following facts: February 1st, 1918, the plaintiff sold to the defendant thirty tons of alfalfa feed f. o. b. New York, payable sight draft attached to bill of lading, and shipped…
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, C. J.
The plaintiff’s appeal is confined to an attempt to correct three paragraphs of the finding. We have examined the evidence as certified, and think this appeal is without merit.
The defendant rests its argument upon its appeal, upon three grounds. Before taking these up seriatim, it should be pointed out that the defendant has not had the evidence certified in aid of its claim to correct the finding. The evidence is before the court in aid of the plaintiff’s appeal and can be used for no other purpose.
First. The defendant claims that the subordinate facts found do not support the conclusions…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Scholfield Gear & Pulley Co. v. ScholfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
- Bergeron v. MilesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
- Watson v. New Milford Water Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
- Hicks v. DeemerIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
- King v. WhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kilduff v. Adams, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Coleman v. BrighamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932