Legal Opinion
HOPKINS v. LAFORTUNE
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided December 22, 2016No. Case Number: PR-2016-0757PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
*1284ORDER DENYING EXTRAORDINARY RELIEF, LIFTING STAY AND REMANDING MATTER TO THE DISTRICT COURT
¶ 1 On August 19, 2016, Petitioner, by and through counsel Patrick Adams, filed an Emergency Petition for Writ of Prohibition and/or Mandamus and a motion for suspension of the Ten-Day Rule requirement of Rule 10.2, Rules of the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals, Title 22, Ch.18, App. (2016). Petitioner seeks extraordinary relief from the order of the District Court of Tulsa County in Case No. CF-2016-530 denying Petitioner’s motion to dismiss based upon a violation of the Interstate Agreement on…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- New York v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Ullery v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1999
- Matthews v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2005
- Bell v. State Ex Rel. LaneCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1986
- Gallimore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1997
3Cited by1 opinion
- HOPKINS v. LAFORTUNECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2016