Prezlak v. Padrone
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
67 N.J. Super. 95 (1961)
169 A.2d 852
MAURICE G. PREZLAK AND MARIE PREZLAK, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
CARL A. PADRONE AND DONALD F. MacART, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided March 29, 1961.
Mr. Julius Fielo, attorney for plaintiffs.
Mr. Russel E. Greco, attorney for defendants.
MATTHEWS, J.C.C. (specially assigned).
This is a proceeding in lieu of prerogative writs, in which plaintiffs, as citizens and taxpayers of the City of East Orange, challenge the action taken by a bare majority of the remaining members of the city council of that city in seating the defendant Padrone…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Carozza v. Federal Finance & Credit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
- Goff v. HuntSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- Ross v. MillerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
- City of Nevada v. SlemmonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Northwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Board of CommissionersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
- Edgewater Park v. Edgewater Park Housing Auth.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
- Demoura v. City of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
- Gemeny v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
- Hainesport Township. v. Burlington County Board of TaxationNew Jersey Tax Court · 2009