Legal Opinion

Cravens v. Kitts

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1878PublishedCited by 14 opinions

From the Ripley Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

Suit for partition and to quiet title. The complaint is in two paragraphs, of which the following is a copy of one :

“ Sarah Kitts complains of the defendants, and says, that, on the 14th day of October, 1873, David H. Kitts departed this life intestate, and the owner in fee-simple of the following real estate, in Ripley county, Indiana, viz., the east half of the north-west quarter of section 27, and all of the north half of the north-east quarter of said section 27 that lies west of the old plank road, all in township 8 north, of range 11 east, containing one hundred and tw-enty-four acres,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Johnston v. GlancyIndiana Supreme Court · 1835
  2. Goodwin v. GoodwinIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Milligan v. PooleIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Ketcham v. HillIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Malady v. McEnaryIndiana Supreme Court · 1868

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Luntz v. GreveIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Miller v. NobleIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Kitts v. WillsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Kenney v. PhillipyIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Thorp v. HanesIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API