Legal Opinion

Burns v. Philadelphia Transp. Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 20, 1953No. 12690PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELSH, District Judge.

Plaintiff has moved pursuant to Fed. Rules Civ.Proc. rule 34, 28 U.S.C.A., for *49the production of (1) statement of the decedent and (2) statement obtained by the defendant from its employee, John Robb Russie, the operator of defendant’s trolley in the accident.

The good cause required by Rule 34 has been shown in the case of the statement obtained from the decedent and accordingly the plaintiff is entitled to the production of same. The facts constituting good cause are as follows: The decedent was not given a copy of the statement obtained from him by the defendant; at…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Burns v. MulderDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Hawk v. Wil-Mar, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
  3. Jones v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANYSuperior Court of Delaware · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API