Kasar v. Miller Printing Machinery Co.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
ROSENBERG, District Judge.
In this action a complaint was filed for damages for personal injuries suffered by the plaintiff because of a breach of warranty and negligence in the manufacture and design of a valve device in a fire extinguisher.
The plaintiff has presented to the defendant requests for admissions. The defendant objects to these requests as calling for the defendant’s opinions or conclusions. It further argues that statements made in interrogatories and depositions, now of record in this case, are those of experts and as such should be submitted to a jury for determination as *202to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Otto E. Pritchard v. Liggett & Myers Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
- McSparran v. HaniganDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1963
- Johnstone v. CronlundDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1960
- Pittsburgh Hotels Ass'n v. Urban Redevelopment AuthorityDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
- Lavino Shipping Co. v. S. C. Loveland Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Jenetta W. Pickens v. The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Lakehead Pipe Line Co. v. American Home Assurance Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1997
- Reid Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. Bellevue PropertiesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
- Voisin v. LukeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1966
- Rosado v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.