Legal Opinion

Aronson v. Congregation Temple De Hirsch

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 16, 1960No. 59-309PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

A motion to dismiss this appeal was presented and argued to this court on behalf of certain of the appellees. The appeal, which was instituted on May 28, 1959, is from an order of the county judge’s court of Dade County in a probate matter. Upon consideration thereof it is the ruling of this court that the motion to dismiss be denied.

As grounds for the motion appellees stated that the notice of appeal was filed 38 days after the date of entry of the order appealed from, which was April 20, 1959, and that this court ruled, in the case of In re Wartman’s Estate, Fla.App.1960, 118 So.2d 838,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Florida Forest & Park Service v. Eston StricklandSupreme Court of Florida · 1944
  2. Davis v. Artley Construction Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1944
  3. Tigertail Quarries, Inc. v. WardSupreme Court of Florida · 1944
  4. Wartman v. WartmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  5. Contractors Contract Noy 5948 v. MorrisSupreme Court of Florida · 1944

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Congregation Temple De Hirsch v. AronsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1961
  2. Eddings v. VOLKSWAGENWERK, AGDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1986
  3. Donna Koppel v. Laura OchoaSupreme Court of Florida · 2018
  4. Fuller v. RileyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  5. Miculka v. American Mail Line, Ltd.District Court, D. Oregon · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API