Legal Opinion

Mires v. Hogan

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 29, 1924No. 12665PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

JONES, O.

This suit was instituted in tbe district court of Kingfisher county, Okla., March 22, 1917, by tbe defendant in error, S, W. Hogan, against plaintiff in error, Ervin M. Mires, and the First National Bank of Cashion, Okla.. for tbe recovery of the sum of $2 000, as evidenced by a certain promissory note, interest, and attorney’s fee. The note and mortgage sued on was executed in December, 3909, due and payable -three years from date.

Plaintiff in error, defendant below, tiled bis answerl and cross-pejtitioln in which be charges that the note and mortgage constituted a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chestnut Smith v. LynchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Roof v. FranksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Ferguson v. Union Nat. Bank of Columbus, OhioSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. Turner v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Peters v. Golden Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  2. Mead v. MeadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  3. In Re Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.'s ProtestSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  4. Jones v. First Nat. Bank of OktahaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Garner v. Tulsa Bldg. & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API