Legal Opinion

State v. Ray

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided May 4, 2017No. 20121040-CAPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ORME, Judge:

¶ 1 Erie Matthew Ray, then twenty-eight years old, engaged in a wholly inappropriate relationship with a fifteen-year-old girl (Victim). Growing out of that relationship, Ray was charged with several sexual offenses and, after a jury trial, was found guilty of forcible sexual abuse, a second degree felony. See Utah Code Ann. § 76-5-404(2)(a) (Lexis-Nexis 2012). He was acquitted of a charge of object rape, and the jury could not reach a verdict on two counts of forcible sodomy. Because trial counsel provided Ray ineffective assistance by failing to request a jury instruction…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Mills v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. State v. RobbinsUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. PraterUtah Supreme Court · 2017

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. RayUtah Supreme Court · 2020
  2. State v. RiveraCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
  3. State v. JokCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
  4. State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
  5. State v. RayCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API