Legal Opinion

United States v. Del Ray Keith Chandler

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided September 28, 1995No. 94-2019PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, District Judge.

Del Ray Keith Chandler appeals from his convictions 1 for misapplication of bank funds, 18 U.S.C. § 657, offering a gratuity, 18 U.S.C. § 215(a)(1), and accepting a gratuity, 18 U.S.C. § 215(a)(2). We affirm.

In October 1985, Chandler, along with David Siegel and Warren Halperin (the “purchasers”), each acquired a one-third interest in 93 percent of the stock of West Helena Savings and Loan (“WHS & L”). Each purchaser was to obtain a loan in the amount of $235,000 from the First American Bank of Los Angeles (“First American”) to finance the purchase of the WHS & L stock.…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Smith v. GoguenSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. United States v. Fernando Diaz-Diaz, United States of America v. Fernando Diaz-DiazCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
  2. United States v. BennettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  3. United States v. Chase Alone Iron EyesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
  4. United States v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  5. United States v. MuellerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API