United States v. Del Ray Keith Chandler
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, District Judge.
Del Ray Keith Chandler appeals from his convictions 1 for misapplication of bank funds, 18 U.S.C. § 657, offering a gratuity, 18 U.S.C. § 215(a)(1), and accepting a gratuity, 18 U.S.C. § 215(a)(2). We affirm.
In October 1985, Chandler, along with David Siegel and Warren Halperin (the “purchasers”), each acquired a one-third interest in 93 percent of the stock of West Helena Savings and Loan (“WHS & L”). Each purchaser was to obtain a loan in the amount of $235,000 from the First American Bank of Los Angeles (“First American”) to finance the purchase of the WHS & L stock.…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Smith v. GoguenSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. Fernando Diaz-Diaz, United States of America v. Fernando Diaz-DiazCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. BennettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Chase Alone Iron EyesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. MuellerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.