Legal Opinion

City of Chicago v. Sperbeck

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 29, 1897PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Assumpsit, for the recovery of money paid under duress. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Richard S. Tuthill, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Waterman

In County of La Salle v. Simmons, 5 G-il. pp. 515, 516, it was proved by the plaintiff that, in the year 1837, the county commissioners of La Salle county gave notice that they would grant a license for a ferry across the Illinois river, at the town of Ottawa, to the person that would denote the largest sum of money to the county; that up to that time the plaintiff had kept the ferry, and was an applicant for a license to continue the same; that on the day the license was granted, several offers were made for the franchise, when the plaintiff finally bid the sum of $500. The plaintiff then…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chicago & Alton Railroad v. Chicago, Vermilion & Wilmington Coal Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Ripley v. GelstonNew York Supreme Court · 1812
  3. Bradford v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1861
  4. Harvey & Boyd v. President & Board of Trustees of OlneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
  5. Meek v. McClureCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dale v. SimonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
  2. Great Northern Railway Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Rees v. SchmitsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1911
  4. City of Chicago v. Waukesha Imperial Spring Brewing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1901
  5. Union Bag & Paper Corp. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API