Legal Opinion

Hopkirk v. Page

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Virginia

Decided May 15, 1822PublishedCited by 15 opinions

This was a. suit brought in 1819, on the chancery side of this court, by James Hop-kirk, a subject of the king of Great Britain, and surviving partner of Spiers, Bowman & Co. merchants of Glasgow, against the defendant, William Byrd Page, executor of William Byrd, deceased, to recover the amount of two bills of exchange, drawn by said William Byrd, late of Westover, Virginia, on Bobert Cary & Co. of London.

Read the full summary

This was a. suit brought in 1819, on the chancery side of this court, by James Hop-kirk, a subject of the king of Great Britain, and surviving partner of Spiers, Bowman & Co. merchants of Glasgow, against the defendant, William Byrd Page, executor of William Byrd, deceased, to recover the amount of two bills of exchange, drawn by said William Byrd, late of Westover, Virginia, on Bobert Cary & Co. of London. The first bill was for £353 6s. sterling, payable at sixty days sight to Edward Brisbane or order, and bearing date July 19, 1774, which bill was indorsed by the said Brisbane to Alexander…

1Opinion of the Court

MARSHALL, Circuit Justice.

This suit is brought to obtain payment of two bills of exchange drawn by the late William Byrd, of Virginia, on Robert Cary & Co., merchants of London, the one in the year 1774, and the other in 1775. These bills were regularly protested; but the defendant makes several objections to paying them. The first to be considered is, that no notice of their non-payment and protest was given either to William Byrd in his lifetime, or to his representatives, since his death. The plaintiff contends that this notice was unnecessary, because the drawer had no funds in the hands…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Boone v. RobertIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Fleming v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
  3. Rice v. TarverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1848
  4. Fleming v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
  5. Tunno & Cox v. LagueNew York Supreme Court · 1800

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API