Legal Opinion

Gerosa v. Savasta

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 13, 2002No. 01 CIV.1761(AKH)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS

HELLERSTEIN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, the trustees of an employee benefit fund, sue the fund’s actuary to recover damages caused by the actuary’s negligence. The actuary, in analyzing and reporting on the fund’s actual and expected experience, reported that the fund was over-funded and recommended to the trustees that they increase benefits payable to participants and beneficiaries. A year later, the actuary reported that it had erred, that the fund actually had been underfunded, and that the data that it had used to arrive at its erroneous report…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gerosa v. Savasta & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  2. Gerosa v. Savasta & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  3. Rubio v. Chock Full O'Nuts Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
  4. Neidich v. Estate of NeidichDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
  5. Dunkin'Donuts Inc. v. Barr Donut, LLC.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API