Legal Opinion
United States v. Jay Briley
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided October 22, 2014No. 13-4831PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge WILKINSON wrote the opinion, in which Judge DUNCAN and Judge KEENAN joined.
WILKINSON, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Jay Bonanza Briley was convicted after a two-day jury trial on four counts arising from intimate sexual activities in a national park and an ensuing physical altercation with United States Park Police officers. Briley now challenges the interpretation of the statute under which he was convicted, 18 U.S.C. §111. He also contests the admission of evidence of a subsequent act under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b). Finding no reversible error, we…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. FeolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- United States v. Thomas Faulls, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
- Edward Nero v. Marilyn MosbyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. William WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Larry RecioCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.